This analysis argues that explaining biological spontaneity requires diverse scientific explanations, revealing complexity in self-assembly.
In this paper, I argue that explaining spontaneous phenomena in biology requires multiple types of scientific explanations. First, I contend that explaining spontaneity necessitates citing both topological and nomological features as explanans. Second, I assert that the context-sensitivity of spontaneity complicates mechanistic localization, necessitating the inclusion of functional and network features to account for mechanistic operations. To develop this argument, I present two models of activated self-assembly and their roles in explaining two cases of biological structures: virus capsids and microtubule dynamics. This approach reveals a complex explanatory landscape that spans multiple levels of generality. I term this structure of explanations an "explanatory reservoir."
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sebastian Sander Oest (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: