Retrospective analysis reveals lower-neck involvement and response predict distant metastasis in HNSCC, suggesting improved risk stratification.
Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate whether lower-neck involvement and post-concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) response predict distant metastasis (DM) in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) treated with definitive intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT)-based CCRT.Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 210 patients with non-metastatic HNSCC treated with definitive IMRT-based CCRT between 2009 and 2020.Lower-neck involvement was defined as radiologic involvement of inferior cervical lymph nodes.Post-treatment response was categorized as complete response (CR) versus non-CR.Logistic and Cox regression models were used to identify predictors of DM and survival outcomes.Results: At a median follow-up of 59.8 months, DM developed in 51 patients (24.3%).In multivariable logistic analysis, lower-neck involvement (odds ratio [OR], 2.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.18 to 4.54; p = 0.014) and non-CR (OR, 2.57; 95% CI, 1.31 to 5.05; p = 0.006) independently predicted DM.In Cox analyses, lower-neck involvement was associated with inferior distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) (hazard ratio [HR], 2.07; 95% CI, 1.15 to 3.75; p = 0.016) and progression-free survival (PFS) (HR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.19 to 3.14; p = 0.008), whereas non-CR predicted worse DMFS (HR, 2.71; 95% CI, 1.49 to 4.95; p = 0.001), PFS (HR, 3.77; 95% CI, 2.25 to 6.33; p < 0.001), and overall survival (HR, 5.08; 95% CI, 1.94 to 13.34; p < 0.001).Conclusion: Lower-neck involvement and post-CCRT response independently predict DM after definitive CCRT for HNSCC and may improve risk stratification for systemic failure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: