Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
June 20, 2026Australian Energy Producers journal.

Session 1. Oral Presentation for: The market substitution argument – what can we learn from the 2020–2023 Chinese coal import bans?

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

AGAndrew Garnett

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Analyzed the market substitution dynamics during China's coal import bans, indicating implications for fossil fuel export regulations.

Key Points

  • This analysis examines the impact of China's coal import bans on market substitution and fossil fuel dynamics.
  • Reviewed coal import, production, and consumption data during the bans.
  • Compared imports from Australia with those from Indonesia, Russia, and Mongolia.
  • Analyzed the implications of the market substitution argument on coal export approvals.
  • China increased coal imports from Indonesia, Russia, and Mongolia during the ban.
  • Domestic coal production in China rose to mitigate supply shortfalls.
  • Despite decreased Australian coal imports, overall coal consumption and emissions in China did not significantly decline.

Cite This Study

Andrew Garnett (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a362e91db0793dc1a5363a2https://doi.org/10.1071/ep26523
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share