Reveals alternative polyadenylation's role in pollen development and flowering time, indicating PAPS1's regulatory influence.
Alternative polyadenylation (APA) serves as a critical co-transcriptional regulatory mechanism that shapes mRNA fate and protein function. POLY(A) POLYMERASE 1 (PAPS1) contributes to poly(A) tail synthesis; however, its relationship to poly(A) site choice is less well characterized. Here, we profiled PAPS1-associated poly(A) site usage across Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) tissues using UMI-quantified poly(A) tag sequencing (qPAT-seq). Across tissues, paps1-4 showed tissue-dependent shifts in poly(A) site usage, with pronounced effects in pollen. In the paps1-4 mutant, polyadenylated transcripts were biased toward longer isoforms with significantly longer 3' UTRs, and poly(A) signal usage was altered in distinct ways: a U-to-A shift immediately downstream of poly(A) sites occurred in leaves and flower buds, whereas pollen showed more complex motif combinations with reduced usage of canonical cis-elements. In pollen, DE-APAGs included multiple genes previously linked to a pollen developmental regulatory module involving AT-RICH INTERACTING DOMAIN-CONTAINING PROTEIN 1 (ARID1), RETINOBLASTOMA RELATED 1 (RBR1), and DUO POLLEN1 (DUO1), showing coordinated changes in APA and expression. Flowering-time-related terms were also enriched among genes with significantly altered APA in paps1-4, including regulators connected to FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC) and photoperiod responses, and these changes were more consistent with poly(A) site selection differences than with widespread poly(A) tail length changes. Notably, multiple poly(A) factors in pollen switched between single- and multi-poly(A) site usage patterns in paps1-4, representing a major component of PAPS1-associated regulation. Together, these findings reveal tissue-specific APA alterations associated with PAPS1 and highlight pollen and flowering pathways as key contexts of its regulatory influence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: