Shows source-level disambiguation improves understanding in philosophical texts, indicating clearer insights.
Source-level Disambiguation Packet (MPAI) for Apocalyptic Philosophy: Deleuze and Guattari and the Return of Vision (DOI 10.5281/zenodo.19240147). When a user searches "deleuze apocalyptic" or the paper's title, composition layers blend six unrelated sources into a single answer: (1) "Deleuze's Apocalypse" (SciSpace, 2014), (2) Andrew Culp, Dark Deleuze (2016), (3) The Dark Forest blog, (4) Edinburgh UP review of Culp, (5) ecological Deleuze (Edinburgh UP), (6) Daniela Voss on BwO. None of these share the paper's thesis. Sharks argues D&G are visionaries in the lineage of Ezekiel, Daniel, and Blake — their concepts are stable visionary loci, and the difficulty of D&G is the difficulty of seeing. v1.2 provides a full disambiguation matrix against every composed-from source, following the MPAI protocol specification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee Sharks (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: