Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Shows improved screening accuracy in infants, suggesting better clinical outcomes through telemedicine.
PURPOSE: To present safety and effectiveness data on a real-world retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) telemedicine screening model in Northern Ireland and to evaluate a novel virtual multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach to ROP decision-making. METHODS: Data were collected on all ROP screens performed in Northern Ireland between May 1, 2023, and October 31, 2023. A total of 431 screens (N = 127 infants) were undertaken: 250 by imagers only, 40 by both imagers and ophthalmologists using binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy, and 141 by ophthalmologists only. A survey of MDT members (n = 17) assessed the perceived value of the virtual MDT model. RESULTS: Fifty-eight percent of screens were completed by ROP imagers, with 98.2% sensitivity in detecting any ROP, 100% sensitivity in detecting treatment-warranted ROP, and 100% specificity of determining absence of ROP. Ninety-eight percent of imaging screens were tolerated by infants. The MDT survey demonstrated favorable feedback, including how TeleROP-NI increases the likelihood of trainees undertaking ROP screening. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that the TeleROP-NI significantly reduced ophthalmologist workload and streamlined organizational barriers. Imaging of infants by nonclinicians is a safe and valuable practice, which allows an MDT approach to collective decision-making when treating patients in an area of medicine with serious clinical and medicolegal implications if disease is missed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Carr et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: