Shows low-loss switching performance in 6G mmWave components, highlighting potential for future communications.
Next-generation 6G communication requires radio-frequency components capable of operating above 100 GHz with low loss, high isolation, and zero static power—requirements that challenge complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) and microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) technologies. Here, we report transfer-free, large-area millimeter-wave (mmWave) switches based on solution-processed MoS2. While solution-processed 2D materials are often viewed as inferior to their crystalline counterparts due to high defect densities, we demonstrate that their edge-rich morphology is, in fact, a performance enabler. These edge defects act as intrinsic templates that confine Cu-filament pathways, enabling rapid (76 ns) and low-energy switching (1.57 nJ) with > 2000 cycles and uniform zero static-power operation, as corroborated by Kelvin probe force microscopy, conductive atomic force microscopy and low-temperature studies. The resulting switches achieve an low insertion loss ( < 0.1 dB) and high isolation ( > 35 dB) at 67 GHz. Notably, they exhibit a switching figure-of-merit (RON·COFF) of ~ 0.8 fs (fco ~ 187 THz), surpassing previously reported 2D switches. Importantly, by adopting an inverse-state operational scheme in a SHUNT architecture, we mitigate self-switching and achieve improved power handling (P0.1dB > 10 dBm) and linearity (IIP3 > 42.1 dBm). Finally, we demonstrate the platform’s circuit-level viability by integrating the switches into a true-time-delay and hybrid-coupled phase shifters targeting 30 GHz mmWave applications. Here, the authors report millimeter-wave switches based on large-area solution-processed MoS2 films, showing that sulfur-vacancy-rich edges of the 2D nanosheets facilitate low-energy resistive switching, enabling a switching figure-of-merit of ~0.8 fs, insertion losses <0.1 dB and isolation >35 dB at 67 GHz.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pyo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: