Randomized trial demonstrates that interfacial strength influences adhesion under varying time and temperature conditions, suggesting new insights into adhesive behavior.
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide In the conventional description, peeling of an adhesive from a solid substrate is expressed in terms of adhesion energies at adhesive-substrate interfaces. However, this energy-based perspective faced considerable difficulties in explaining why the adhesion energy, also known as peel strength Γ p, is many orders of magnitude greater than Dupré’s thermodynamic work of adhesion, Γ 0 . In this study, we present experimental evidence to demonstrate that polymer adhesion is governed by interfacial strength σ interf, defined by the pair of adhesive and substrate. A tensile adhesion test is performed to estimate σ interf from adhesion strength σ adh equal to the engineering stress at detachment. This test stretches, at various rates under different temperatures, one end of a ribbon-like specimen with the other end adhered to the same substrate used in peeling tests until adhesive detachment. The dependence of σ adh on applied rate and temperature is found to be the same as that of Γ p from conventional peeling tests on peeling speed v p and temperature. Our stress perspective shows that Γ p explicitly correlates with σ adh through a characteristic length scale P instead of Γ 0 . Here, P is the distance from the peeling front, beyond which the adhesive undergoes little deformation. Since P is a much larger length scale than a molecular scale and σ adh directly depends on polymer–substrate interfacial interactions, Γ p explicitly depends on σ interf . As activated processes, in both peeling and tensile adhesion tests, interfacial debonding on shorter time scales and lower temperature required higher interfacial stress.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: