Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
June 20, 2026Social Sciences & Humanities OpenOpen Access

Governing the black box in adjudication: Policy frameworks for algorithmic transparency in international arbitration

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

TATariq K. AlhasanUniversidad de León

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Randomized trial evaluates algorithmic transparency risks in international arbitration, suggesting a new governance framework.

Key Points

  • This research addresses the implications of generative AI in arbitration systems and advocates for enhanced transparency mechanisms.
  • Utilized doctrinal and comparative legal analysis
  • Evaluated the New York Convention and UNCITRAL Model Law as legal frameworks
  • Developed the Algorithmic Disclosure Protocol based on the EU AI Act's principles
  • Identified risks of generative AI including automation bias and confidentiality exposure
  • Proposed a tiered disclosure and verification framework to enhance procedural legitimacy
  • Outlined auditability rights and verification duties for stakeholders in arbitration

Cite This Study

Tariq K. Alhasan (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a362f3bdb0793dc1a536b85https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2026.103109
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The use of technology in case management in international investment arbitration: a realistic approach2024 · 4 citations
  2. 2Unveiling the Black Box: Bringing Algorithmic Transparency to AI2024 · 66 citations
  3. 3Dual erosion of equality and remedy in algorithmic decision systems2026 · 1 citations
  4. 4Arbitrating administrative disputes in France in defiance of the Conseil D’État: public international law or substantive rules?2026 · 1 citations
  5. 5Challenges for generative AI in legal reasoning2026 · 6 citations