Narrative review evaluates nipple-areola complex prostheses for breast reconstruction, highlighting patient-centered outcomes.
Breast reconstruction following mastectomy or congenital absence has evolved significantly, with increasing emphasis on aesthetic outcomes and patient- centered care. While restoration of breast volume is often achieved through surgical techniques, reconstruction of the nipple- areola complex remains a challenging step and is essential for achieving anatomical and psychosocial completeness. Surgical approaches are associated with variable outcomes and may not be suitable or desirable for all patients. This article presents a narrative review supported by illustrative clinical cases, evaluating the role of nipple- areola complex prostheses as a non- surgical option within the reconstructive algorithm. Two clinical scenarios are described: a patient with Poland syndrome and congenital breast agenesis, and a patient following mastectomy for breast cancer. In both cases, prosthetic reconstruction provided satisfactory aesthetic results and improved body image. These prostheses represent a safe, reversible, and minimally invasive alternative, particularly relevant for patients who are not candidates for further surgery or who decline additional procedures. Their use supports patient-centered care and shared decision-making, enabling individualized reconstructive strategies. They should be considered a complementary, and in selected cases primary, option within breast reconstruction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Catarina Reis (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: