Identifies charge-transfer mechanisms in metal-organic frameworks, suggesting new adsorbent designs.
Strategic design of intrinsic charge-transfer processes in metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) enhances host–guest chemistry. Incorporating tetrazine (TZ) and dihydrotetrazine (DHTZ) linkers into UiO-66(Zr) (Zr 6 O 4 (OH) 4 (BDC) 6, where H 2 BDC is benzene dicarboxylic acid) yields UiO-66(Zr)-TZ and UiO-66(Zr)-DHTZ frameworks with ligand-to-ligand (LLCT) and ground-state ligand-to-metal (LMCT) charge transfers, respectively. In UiO-66(Zr)-TZ, LLCT is evidenced by a visible n -to-π* DRS band. In UiO-66(Zr)-DHTZ, a paramagnetically modified electronic structure gives DHTZ-to-Zr(IV) LMCT, confirmed by an absorption band at 299 nm (DRS) and an EPR signal. I 2 was used as a competitive acceptor to probe these charge transfers. Iodine uptake in UiO-66(Zr)-TZ interrupts LLCT, shown by a moderate N(1s) XPS red shift and a new EPR signal. In UiO-66(Zr)-DHTZ, I 2 capture directly disrupts the LMCT, quenching the EPR signal and causing a −2.25 eV N(1s) XPS red shift. Suppression of the C═N IR vibration in both frameworks confirms electronic perturbation of the linkers. This work demonstrates targeted exploitation of intrinsic charge-transfer processes as a strategy for designing adsorbents, where linker chemistry selectively activates ligand-centered or metal-involved capture.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Razavi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: