Review highlights how alternative splicing regulates gene expression in plants, impacting development and stress adaptation.
Alternative splicing (AS) is a major post-transcriptional regulatory mechanism that greatly expands transcriptomic and proteomic diversity in plants. Recent studies have demonstrated that AS dynamically regulates gene expression during plant development and under diverse environmental conditions through isoform-specific modulation of transcript stability, translation efficiency, protein localization, and signaling pathways. In this review, we summarize recent advances in understanding the roles of AS in plant development and abiotic stress responses. Mechanistically, splice site selection is regulated through coordinated interactions among cis-regulatory elements, RNA-binding proteins, RNA secondary structures, transcriptional kinetics, chromatin organization, and spliceosomal dynamics. AS plays critical roles in various developmental processes, including seed germination, vegetative growth, flowering transition, and senescence, while also contributing to plant adaptation to abiotic stresses such as osmotic, temperature, and oxidative stresses. Particular emphasis is placed on the diverse regulatory outcomes of AS, including isoform-specific protein functions, AS-coupled nonsense-mediated decay, transcript stability control, and context-dependent isoform switching. We further discuss the varying levels of experimental evidence supporting reported AS events, ranging from transcriptome-wide observations to genetically and biochemically validated isoform functions. Moreover, recent advances in long-read sequencing, single-cell transcriptomics, proteogenomics, and genome-engineering technologies are accelerating the functional characterization of splice isoforms and uncovering the complexity of AS-mediated regulatory networks. Collectively, these advances highlight AS as a central mechanism coordinating plant developmental plasticity and environmental adaptation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Seok et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: