Evaluates GPR waveforms on signal-to-noise ratio in soil moisture monitoring, suggesting effective waveform selection.
High-resolution soil moisture monitoring in a lysimeter requires precise Ground-Penetrating Radar (GPR) systems that can provide clean time-domain data for a Full-Waveform Inversion (FWI) algorithm. Using high-speed Radio Frequency System-on-Module (RFSoM) devices provides flexibility in signal generation. To optimize such a system, an appropriate transmit waveform and processing pipeline need to be selected. This paper presents a performance evaluation of three GPR waveforms—impulse, Stepped-Frequency Continuous Wave (SFCW) and non-linear Frequency-Modulated Continuous Wave (FMCW/chirp)—on the same hardware setup. To ensure a fair comparison, all waveforms were tested under an identical total measurement time. Numerical simulations were performed using an electromagnetic model of the system. Physical validation was conducted in an anechoic chamber using a 4 GS/s RFSoM setup and planar elliptical dipole antennas. Simulations showed that both sinewave-based methods provide better signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) than the impulse GPR, with the non-linear chirp achieving the best results (20.7 dB improvement compared to impulse). Experimental measurements supported these results, showing better SNR across the frequency band for the SFCW and chirp waveforms. Because of its high SNR and simple hardware implementation, the non-linear chirp was identified as the most suitable waveform for this RFSoM-based GPR system.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chkhetia et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: