Qualitative analysis of climate change perceptions in Canadians, suggesting pathways for collective action.
Background: Given the growing urgency and severity of climate change, civic discourse around the issue is becoming increasingly important. Analysis: The authors, using a rhetorical bounded-coding perspective to identify common conversational approaches, qualitatively analyzed open-ended responses from a national survey of Canadians on their perceptions of and communication habits around climate change. Conclusions and implications: Canadians’ climate conversations are rooted in personal understandings and experiences of the issue. Through the lens of rhetorical studies, the authors discuss how this situation might help move conversations from individual to collective action on climate change.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mehlenbacher et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: