Randomized trial demonstrates improved signal stability in laser-induced acoustic communication, suggesting a new focal-point method could enhance system performance.
Laser-induced acoustic communication is a highly adaptable cross-medium technique that combines the advantages of optical transmission through air and acoustic transmission underwater. However, poor signal stability at high repetition frequencies currently hinders its widespread application. To address this, this paper proposes an innovative scanning focal-point method to enhance stability. Traditional methods such as beam scanning, focus control, and distributed interaction are primarily aimed at enhancing sound pressure in a specific direction, achieving near-field/far-field focusing, or improving the signal-to-noise ratio through coherent synthesis of ultrasonic intensity. In contrast, the method proposed in this paper is intended to avoid the interference of droplets and vapor generated by single-point breakdown under high repetition frequencies, which would otherwise degrade the laser-acoustic conversion efficiency. It is therefore an active defense strategy specifically targeting the stability of laser-induced acoustic communication. First, optical simulation software was used to analyze the effects of surface ripples and bubbles on focal spot displacement and size. Next, a single-pulse experimental system was developed to measure the range and duration of surface depressions caused by optical breakdown. Finally, a scanning focal-point system was constructed for comparative experiments, with results recorded via hydrophones and high-speed cameras. The maximum laser-induced acoustic signal generated by the scanning focal-point method is 7.4 times that produced by single-point breakdown. The experimental results demonstrate that the scanning focal-point method can effectively avoid the influence of water surface disturbance and steam on the optoacoustic conversion efficiency and significantly improve the amplitude and stability of the laser-induced acoustic signal.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: