Ethnographic analysis explores military ideology and conscience destruction among soldiers in Okinawa, suggesting critical implications.
Okinawa has been the site of one of the largest overseas concentrations of American military personnel and a prominent anti-base movement in opposition to the U.S. military presence since 1945. Reflecting on Marshall Sahlins' "The Destruction of Conscience in Vietnam" argument (2000 [1966]), developed in the midst of the U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War, I suggest that the contradictions of the American military presence in Okinawa necessitate the destruction of conscience, even if no active war is being waged on the island. Using an ethnographic reading of U.S. military materials and interviews with soldiers deployed to Okinawa, I argue that military ideology consistently disavows crimes and violence committed by soldiers and displaces soldiers' anxieties about their presence onto fictitious Others. I conclude by showing how those processes evidence the destruction of conscience as American soldiers paper over and ignore the consequences of the American military presence in Okinawa.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miles Burton (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: