Scoping review maps bereavement experiences in LGBTIQ+ individuals, highlighting care gaps and implications for nursing practice.
Background/Objectives: Grief following the death of a partner is a complex psychosocial process associated with an increased risk of prolonged grief, depression and suicidal ideation. Among lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, intersex, and queer (LGBTIQ+) individuals, these risks are exacerbated by stigma, relational invisibility and family rejection, often resulting in unrecognized or disenfranchised grief. This scoping review aimed to map the available evidence on the experiences of bereavement following the death of a partner among LGBTIQ+ individuals between 2016 and 2026, identifying study types, recurring themes and knowledge gaps relevant to nursing practice. Methods: A scoping review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) extension and the methodology of the Joanna Briggs Institute. Searches were planned in PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Web of Science (2016–March 2026) using combined terms for grief, partner and LGBTIQ+ populations. Primary qualitative, quantitative and mixed-methods studies, as well as selected grey literature that explicitly addressed grief following the death of a partner in LGBTIQ+ individuals were considered. Results: The search identified 1032 records; after removing duplicates (n = 356), 676 titles/abstracts were screened, and 94 full texts were assessed. Eighteen studies were included, mainly qualitative, and conducted in high-income countries. Key themes included invisibility and lack of recognition of the relationship, managing the disclosure of sexual orientation and gender identity, social isolation and the role of chosen families, and intersectional vulnerabilities in subgroups such as older adults, bisexual people and trans people. Conclusions: The available evidence reflects specific bereavement experiences among LGBTIQ+ individuals that are not adequately captured in traditional models of bereavement care. Significant gaps remain, particularly in Spanish-speaking contexts and in the design and evaluation of nurse-led interventions. This scoping review provides a conceptual basis for future research and for the development of culturally safe clinical practices in supporting LGBTIQ+ individuals through bereavement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
ortega et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: