We examine how institutional investors trade in relation to the asset growth anomaly—the subsequent underperformance of high asset growth stocks—and whether they exploit this mispricing. Using institutional holdings data, we uncover sharp differences between hedge funds and other institutions. Specifically, hedge funds shift their preference away from high asset growth stocks after asset growth information becomes public, indicating an intentional shift. The subsequent underperformance of high-asset growth stocks is concentrated in stocks where hedge funds reduce exposure, while other institutions show neither similar trading patterns nor return predictability. We also present an implementable strategy: at the end of June, go long on low asset growth stocks that the hedge funds bought and short high-asset growth stocks that they sold. This portfolio generates an average monthly return of 1.19%, nearly doubling the 0.62% achieved by a standard single-sort asset growth strategy. Overall, the evidence highlights hedge funds’ distinct role in processing asset growth information.
Celiker et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: