Qualitative analysis reveals sovereignism as a privileged response to state authority and power dynamics.
Since the pandemic, sovereign citizens who reject the existence and legitimacy of the state, democracy and the legal order have gained popularity and attention worldwide. Drawing on qualitative fieldwork among sovereign citizens and state authorities in Switzerland and the Netherlands, this article proposes an understanding of sovereignism as privilege. Given that research and public discourse often tend to criminalize, victimize or pathologize sovereign citizens, the article analyses sovereignism as a political phenomenon instead. The focus is placed on power relations and privilege with regard to sovereign citizens’ positionalities (race, class, gender), the presence/absence of the state in their lives, and state response to sovereignism. In interactions with state authorities, sovereignism as privilege manifests in (white) grievance and appeasement, thereby preserving political orders of privilege and hierarchy. The article concludes that sovereignism constitutes a particular, privileged configuration of state rejection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stefan Manser-Egli (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: