Randomized trial investigates language control mechanisms in Chinese EFL learners, suggesting new models for understanding bilingualism.
Aims and Objectives: This study examined whether bilingual language control is shared across comprehension and production or supported by separate mechanisms in a dissimilar language pair. Specifically, we investigated whether Chinese learners of English as a foreign language (EFL) show asymmetric switch costs in comprehension-to-production (C-to-P) language switching. Design: Thirty-three Chinese EFL learners completed a joint language switch paradigm combining picture naming (production) and semantic categorization (comprehension). Language switching in picture naming was triggered by interleaved categorization in Chinese or English. Data and Analysis: Reaction times were analyzed using linear mixed-effects models. Findings: Participants showed a switch benefit in the L1 naming block but no switch effect in the L2 block. This asymmetry is inconsistent with both shared- and separate-control accounts and instead suggests a major contribution of modality control, particularly in the L1 block. Originality: The study provides initial evidence for asymmetric switch benefits in C-to-P language switching and highlights language similarity as a key factor of modality and cross-modality language control. Implications: We propose the Multimodal Inhibitory Control (MIC) model as a framework for predicting control demands across tasks, language pairs, and dominance profiles.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: