Review summarizes advances in biomimetic structures improving fluid flow and heat transfer, highlighting key challenges and applications.
Nature provides efficient strategies for fluid transport and thermal regulation through evolved structural features. This review summarizes recent progress in biomimetic thermal–fluid structures for enhancing fluid flow and heat transfer, with emphasis on the links among biological inspiration, engineering geometry, transport mechanisms, and application performance. Representative designs are classified into tree-like branching and fractal networks, compact hexagonal layouts, and bio-inspired curved morphologies, including riblets, grooves, fins, fluctuating channels, and TPMS structures. Their enhancement mechanisms involve flow redistribution, boundary-layer disturbance, secondary-flow and vortex generation, local acceleration, enlarged heat-transfer area, drag reduction, and compact flow organization. Applications using biomimetic structures are assessed in detail, such as in battery thermal management, electronic cooling, etc. The reviewed studies indicate that biomimetic structures can improve temperature uniformity, suppress hotspots, and enhance thermohydraulic performance, but the gains may be accompanied by pressure-drop or pumping-power penalties. Therefore, coupled thermal–hydraulic evaluation is essential for objective comparison. Key challenges of practical usage are identified in mechanism-based design, manufacturability, reliability, etc. This work establishes the guidance for translating biological forms into practical thermal–fluid structures with balanced efficacy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: