Qualitative study explores translanguaging and its impact on language-minoritized students in EMI settings, highlighting exclusionary practices.
With the dramatic rise of English-medium instruction (EMI) worldwide, questions have been raised about the role of languages other than English for content delivery and communication. A growing body of research has employed a translanguaging lens to examine the dynamic use of multilingual resources in these intrinsically bi/multilingual settings. However, translanguaging studies in EMI higher education have largely focused on the practices and perceptions of lecturers and students who share a first language. Much less is known about the experiences of language-minoritized students. Thus, this study explored pedagogical translanguaging practices and the experiences of language-minoritized, international students at a Turkish university, and compared them to those of Turkish home students. Qualitative data were collected via classroom observations, focus groups and semi-structured interviews. The findings indicate that, while most home students held a positive view of pedagogical translanguaging, the language-minoritized students felt frustrated, excluded, and discriminated against by translanguaging practices in class. Still, language-minoritized students reported using translanguaging for collective thinking and reasoning, which empowered them in their EMI learning. By magnifying the experiences of language-minoritized students, this study calls attention to issues of pedagogical translanguaging and social justice in EMI universities and offers implications for creating more linguistically inclusive classrooms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khorassani et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: