Investigates SCC response of AISI 304L welds in chloride environments, revealing implications for material selection.
Stress corrosion cracking (SCC) of stainless-steel welds in chloride-containing environments remains a major concern in structural and process industries. Although Activated Tungsten Inert Gas (A-TIG) welding has been widely investigated for improving weld penetration and mechanical properties, comparative assessment of SCC behaviour of flux-assisted A-TIG welded AISI 304L stainless steel remains limited. This study investigates the SCC response of AISI 304L stainless steel welds fabricated using conventional TIG (C-TIG) and A-TIG welding employing SiO 2 , TiO 2 , and Cr 2 O 3 activating fluxes under chloride environments. SCC susceptibility was evaluated using Slow Strain Rate Testing (SSRT) in air and 3.5 wt.% NaCl solution. Mechanical degradation behaviour, time-to-failure response, fracture morphology, and localized compositional variations were comparatively assessed. Chloride exposure reduced the mechanical performance of all weld conditions. Among the investigated welds, TiO 2 -assisted A-TIG exhibited the most favourable SCC resistance, achieving a time-to-failure of 115 min compared with 98 min for the C-TIG weld. The SCC susceptibility indices further revealed lower degradation in strength and ductility for TiO 2 -assisted welds (Iσ ≈ 4.18% and Iε ≈ 10.82%) than for C-TIG welds (Iσ ≈ 15.96% and Iε ≈ 28.19%). Fractographic analysis also indicated comparatively reduced crack propagation in TiO 2 -assisted welds. The SCC resistance trend under the investigated conditions was established as TiO 2 A-TIG > Base Metal > Cr 2 O 3 A-TIG > SiO 2 A-TIG > C-TIG. The study provides a direct comparative assessment and performance-based ranking of activating fluxes with respect to SCC behaviour of AISI 304L stainless steel welds exposed to chloride environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dinakar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: