Demonstrates improved reconstruction accuracy in sparse recovery, highlighting enhanced efficiency in processing signals.
Projection-based neurodynamic systems have recently been used for sparse reconstruction, but most existing designs focus on convex <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:msub> <m:mi>L</m:mi> <m:mn>1</m:mn> </m:msub> </m:math> Lβ models and may be suboptimal for highly sparse signals. This paper develops an inertial projection-based neurodynamic system (PBNS) for the nonconvex <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:msub> <m:mi>L</m:mi> <m:mi>q</m:mi> </m:msub> </m:math> Lq -regularized ( <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mrow> <m:mn>0</m:mn> <m:mo><</m:mo> <m:mi>q</m:mi> <m:mo><</m:mo> <m:mn>1</m:mn> </m:mrow> </m:math> 0<q<1 ) sparse recovery problem. By applying a standard variable splitting and introducing a smooth absolute-value regularization, we transform the original model into the minimization of a continuously differentiable objective over a closed convex set, which enables a rigorous dynamical-system formulation. We design a two-layer inertial PBNS driven by the projected gradient mapping and obtain an implementable reconstruction algorithm via time discretization. The proposed dynamics is shown to be globally well-posed (existence and uniqueness of trajectories), and its trajectory converges asymptotically to the equilibrium set under a cocoercivity-type condition, with an additional local convergence result under local cocoercivity. Extensive experiments on synthetic compressed sensing data and real fetal ECG signals demonstrate that the proposed PBNS- <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:msub> <m:mi>L</m:mi> <m:mi>q</m:mi> </m:msub> </m:math> Lq method is stable and achieves improved reconstruction accuracy and efficiency compared with representative convex and nonconvex baselines.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ma et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: