Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Investigates functional connectivity differences in cervical dystonia via sensory tricks, suggesting neural impairment dynamics.
Background/Objectives: Brain dysfunction and symptoms can be improved with a sensory trick (ST) in more than 80% of patients with cervical dystonia (CD). This study aimed to investigate the functional connectivity (FC) of CD patients with different types of STs using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) and to explore the underlying neural mechanisms of STs. Methods: In this study, 35 CD patients (including 15 with classic STs, 15 with forcible STs, 5 with non-STs) and 29 healthy controls (HCs) underwent resting-state fNIRS. We subsequently analyzed FC differences between the groups and their correlations with clinical characteristics. Results: The grand-average FC was significantly higher in the non-ST group than in the forcible ST group. Furthermore, compared to the ST group, the non-ST group exhibited significantly increased FC, primarily involving the prefrontal and sensorimotor networks. In the forcible ST group, this hypoconnectivity was negatively correlated with disease severity scores. Conclusions: This study supports the concept of CD as a networkopathy, suggesting that both the severity and topology of cortical coherence impairment are modulated by the ST phenotype.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: