Systematic review evaluates impact of immunosuppressant drugs on outcomes in cancer patients treated with ICIs, indicating significant implications.
Objectives: To systematically evaluate the impact of immunosuppressant drugs (ISDs) use on clinical outcomes in patients with cancer treated with Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted. Eligible studies reporting overall survival (OS) and/or progression-free survival (PFS), among adult cancer patients receiving ICIs stratified by the use of ISDs. Results: A total of 33 studies with 34,063 patients met the inclusion criteria. Pooled analyses showed significantly worse outcomes among patients receiving ISDs during ICI therapy, with poorer OS (HR = 1.31; 95% CI: 1.10–1.56; p = 0.003) and PFS (HR = 1.39; 95% CI: 1.10–1.76; p = 0.006) compared with those who did not receive ISDs with high heterogeneity of (I² ~80–85%). In subgroup analysis, patients with non–small-cell lung cancer exhibited significantly reduced OS associated with the use of ISDs. Conclusions: The results suggest an association between ISDs use and reduced OS and PFS in patients with cancer receiving ICI treatment. These findings highlight the need for precision-based immune-related adverse events (irAE) management strategies that balance toxicity control with preservation of therapeutic benefit.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alotaibi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: