Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Experimental analysis reveals how spacer structure influences electrical conductivity in radical polyesters, suggesting pathways for enhanced electronic applications.
Electron exchange communication between nitroxide radical sites localized along polymer backbones creates a compelling platform for spin electronics, resistive memory, and optoelectronics. While radical site proximity, chain flexibility, and local ordering form the basis for this communication, how site-to-site spacer structure governs bulk redox charge transfer remains an open question. Herein, epoxide-cyclic anhydride ring-opening copolymerization produces TEMPO-functional radical polyesters, where strictly alternating enchainment installs a radical at every repeat unit while anhydride comonomer varies spacer structure from flexible aliphatic through alicyclic, bicyclic, and semiaromatic. SQUID magnetometry and EPR spectroscopy confirm radical contents of 86-98%; except for the thioether-containing polyester, where sulfur-specific quenching occurs. Density functional theory calculations reveal that rigid aromatic spacers position radical sites closer than flexible aliphatic ones of comparable through-bond atom counts. However, solid-state electrical conductivity measurements demonstrate that glass transition is the primary determinant of bulk charge transport, regardless of whether it is set through spacer flexibility, blending, or block copolymerization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stakem et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: