Investigates pathways of uranium-induced nephrotoxicity in renal cells, suggesting new biomarkers for kidney damage.
As a heavy metal and alpha emitter, uranium U(VI) presents chemical and radiological toxicity risks. Its toxicity particularly targets the kidneys in the event of intoxication, but the detailed study mechanisms leading to uranium‐induced renal failure have not yet been studied based on the adverse outcome pathway (AOP) approach. Using a well‐specialized in vitro model of renal proximal tubule epithelial cells (hRPTEC TERT1), this research aims to contribute to the development of the AOP of kidney toxicity. After identifying the U(VI) concentrations that induce deleterious effects (apoptosis and necrosis/cytotoxicity), key events linked to oxidative stress, apoptosis, survival, inflammation, and kidney toxicity are studied at the gene and protein levels. Apoptosis (Caspase 3/7 activity) is induced starting from exposure to 300 μM and necrosis (LDH assay) from 500 μM with a rate of 60%. hRPTEC cells have an IC50 of 420 μM after 48 h U(VI) exposure. Uranium induces an early 2‐fold rise in ROS production, and an antioxidant response was observed accordingly. Cell survival signaling appeared to be enhanced at 100 μM, while higher concentrations (> 300 μM) induced a marked inflammatory response, with increased levels of TNFα (6,5‐fold), IL‐6, and IL‐18, leading to a 16% increase in caspase 3/7 at 300 μM and LDH at 500 μM. A slight increase of 22% in the KIM‐1 protein level is observed at 500 μM, and limited changes occurred for other nephrotoxicity biomarkers. In conclusion, this exploratory work generated a multiplex panel detailing the key events in the AOP of uranium‐induced renal failure (Graphical Abstract). This panel features a human phenotype of renal proximal tubule epithelial cells, the preferential target of uranium in the kidney, while also considering the dose‐dependent effects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Frèrejacques et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: