Retrospective analysis evaluates urinalysis performance in predicting culture positivity in children, suggesting useful diagnostic tools.
Background Diagnosis of urinary tract infection (UTI) in children with neurogenic bladder is challenging due to frequent bacterial colonization and unreliable symptom assessment. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of urinalysis parameters in predicting urine culture positivity in children undergoing clean intermittent catheterization (CIC). Methods We retrospectively analyzed urine samples from children with neurogenic bladder who underwent CIC between 2015 and 2024. All samples were included regardless of symptom status. Urinalysis parameters, including leukocyte esterase (LE), nitrite, pyuria, and bacteriuria, were evaluated. Culture positivity was defined as growth of a single organism ≥ 10 5 CFU/mL. Generalized estimating equations were used to account for repeated measurements. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and likelihood ratios were calculated for individual and combined parameters. Results A total of 1362 urine samples from 107 patients were analyzed. The combination “Nitrite OR Bacteriuria” achieved the highest AUC (0.84), with sensitivity 0.85, specificity 0.84, PPV 0.84, NPV 0.85, and NLR 0.18. The three‐parameter combination “LE OR Nitrite OR Bacteriuria” showed the highest sensitivity (0.94) and NPV (0.92), with an NLR of 0.10 indicating strong rule‐out potential. Among AND‐rule combinations, “LE AND Nitrite” showed the highest specificity (0.98) and PPV (0.93; PLR 14.27), but low sensitivity (0.36). Conclusions Urinalysis parameter combinations may help predict urine culture positivity (≥ 10 5 CFU/mL) in children undergoing CIC, though these findings cannot distinguish between asymptomatic bacteriuria and clinically significant UTI requiring treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kuas et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: