Examines dynamic properties of geogrid-reinforced soil, suggesting optimal reinforcement strategies.
Although foamed lightweight soil is widely used for its light weight and high strength, its insufficient dynamic performance under cyclic loading and the poorly understood reinforcement mechanism have become key bottlenecks restricting its optimized application. To investigate the dynamic characteristics and influencing factors of geogrid-reinforced foamed lightweight soil (GRFLS), laboratory dynamic triaxial tests were conducted using a DJSZ-100D dynamic–static triaxial testing system. The effects of the number of geogrid layers and wet density on the dynamic mechanical properties were examined, with analysis focused on failure patterns, backbone curves, dynamic strength, dynamic shear modulus, and damping ratio. The results indicate that the inclusion of geogrids effectively restrained the propagation of longitudinal cracks in the foamed lightweight soil. The hyperbolic backbone curves were well characterized by the Hardin–Drnevich model. An increase in wet density significantly enhanced the dynamic strength, and an optimal number of two reinforcement layers was identified based on the reinforced strength–stress ratio. The dynamic elastic modulus and damping ratio of GRFLS increased with growing dynamic strain. Compared with the unreinforced condition, the initial dynamic elastic modulus of the specimens with two geogrid layers increased by an average of 15.6%, and the maximum damping ratio increased by an average of 12.9%. While both geogrid reinforcement and higher wet density effectively increased the dynamic elastic modulus, only an increase in wet density notably improved the damping ratio. Finally, predictive models for the enhanced dynamic elastic modulus and damping ratio, which incorporate wet density and the number of reinforcement layers, were established. These models indirectly reflect the dynamic deviator stress–strain relationship of GRFLS. This study provides a theoretical basis for engineering construction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: