Randomized trial deconstructs benchmarks and their validation process, indicating enhanced reproducibility.
We present an approach to semantically represent benchmarks and benchmark runs to verify and validate numerical algorithms and software packages basing on existing standards (RO-Crate, PROV, metadata4ing) and infrastructures (RO-Hub, NFDI4ING Jupyter Service) . Research Objects in form of RO-Crates allow to pack data together with a small local knowledge graph in form of a JSON-LD file describing the data, its provenance and related information entities in a semantic way basing on schema.org. We use RO-Crates in two different ways: To bring together all the files and information required to run a benchmark, and - basing on the Workflow Run RO-Crate profile suite - to capture the output of a benchmark together with its provenance description, both in a semantic and machine actionable way. The data model bases on schema.org, PROV-O, metadata4ing and the ontologies underlying the MathModDB and MathAlgoDB of MaRDI and the open research knowledge graph (ORKG) and takes into account the Cross-Domain Interoperability Framework (CDIF). A snakemake exporter plugin allows to automatically generate the provenance enriched RO-Crate according to the Workflow Run RO-Crate profile. The resulting RO-Crate objects can be combined in a flexible way to build and query an ad-hoc knowledge graph of benchmarks and their results. While RO-Hub is used as an open infrastructure to host the RO-Crates, the NFDI4ING Jupyter Service allows to query and visualize the results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Iglezakis et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: