Examines creativity-supportive teaching practices in higher education, suggesting a transformative educational framework.
Creativity in higher education is often framed as an employability skill rather than a core educational purpose. This study reconceptualises creativity as a transformational educational outcome - a sustained shift in how students frame problems, regulate learning, exercise agency, navigate uncertainty, and create value in authentic contexts. Guided by the meta-creativity model, we applied a six-facet classroom lens - affective climate, cognitive exploration, metacognitive regulation, behavioural engagement, navigating uncertainty, and creativity-in-action - to examine how students perceive creativity-supportive teaching practices. Data from 140 students across multiple faculties at a public university were analysed using correlational and structural modelling techniques. Results reveal a coherent pattern of associations among perceived teaching practices: supportive climates co-occur with exploration. Exploration is linked to reflective planning; planning is associated with engagement; and engagement is associated with creativity-in-action. Conceptually, the study positions creativity as an outcome of educational transformation rather than a by-product of skill acquisition. Empirically, it provides a transferable framework for observing how higher education teaching is associated with the classroom conditions through which creativity emerges. Practically, it offers educators a structured lens for designing learning environments that cultivate creative growth across disciplines.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Đipa et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: