Randomized trial assesses treatment effects using democratic selection, indicating robust policy analysis methods.
Recent literature has studied how selection into treatment can be com- patible with difference in differences as an identification strategy. I build on this literature by focusing on democratic selection into treatment, and derive necessary and sufficient conditions for parallel trends to hold. I show that implementing difference in differences comparing groups that barely pass and don't pass the policy will consistently recover a local average treatment effect. I conclude by providing sufficient conditions for regression discontinuity design to recover the locally weighted average treatment effect described in Lee (2008) and micro-found this result in a model where treatment is democratically determined.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zayne El-Kaissi (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: