Investigates R&D behavior in crises, revealing distinct resilience patterns in multinational firms, suggesting implications for future strategies.
This study investigates the R&D behavior of the world’s top R&D investors during the Great Financial Crisis and the COVID-19 crisis. Focusing on the resilience of corporate R&D activities, we explore two dimensions: stability and adaptability. Using two large datasets on the world’s leading R&D-investing companies covering the periods 2004–2010 and 2015–2021, thus including both crises, our analysis reveals substantial heterogeneity in how top global R&D-investing companies respond to economic downturns. Three patterns emerge: non-resilient companies (one-third), adaptive resilient companies that quickly recover after initial reductions (one-third), and stable resilient companies that maintain or expand R&D throughout crises (one-third). Remarkably, this distribution remains consistent across both crises, suggesting generalizable response patterns among leading MNEs. However, the mechanisms driving these responses differ between crises. Pre-crisis sales growth consistently emerges as the strongest predictor of stable R&D resilience in both crises, while pre-crisis profitability reinforces adaptive resilience, reflecting firms’ internal financing capabilities. Notably, resource reconfiguration capabilities—proxied by capital expenditure growth—positively influence stable resilience only during COVID-19, likely reflecting digital infrastructure investments that enabled distributed R&D operations under mobility restrictions. Conversely, both high pre-crisis capex intensity and low profitability significantly increase the likelihood of non-resilient behavior, particularly during the 2009 GFC. We also identify significant regional and industry effects that vary between the two crises.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Belitz et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: