Key result
Dynamic risk score effectively predicts clinically significant bleeding on anticoagulation with a 0.78 C-statistic.
Why the study?
Deciding whether to continue anticoagulation beyond 3 months requires assessing bleeding risk, but reliable tools to estimate this risk have been lacking.
Can a novel dynamic risk score accurately predict clinically significant bleeding in patients with incident venous thromboembolism without active cancer after 3 months of anticoagulation?
Cohort (n=51,621)
Can a novel dynamic risk score accurately predict clinically significant bleeding in patients with incident venous thromboembolism without active cancer after 3 months of anticoagulation?
A novel dynamic risk score incorporating 18 predictors provides good discrimination for estimating the risk of clinically significant bleeding in VTE patients considering long-term anticoagulation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May aid bleeding risk stratification for extended VTE anticoagulation; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
BACKGROUND: After 3 months of treatment, clinicians and patients need to decide whether to continue anticoagulant therapy long-term, which is informed by bleeding risk; to date, we have not had a good way to estimate that risk. OBJECTIVES: To develop a dynamic, broad, treatment-adjusted risk score for clinically significant bleeding (CSB). METHODS: UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (2001-2020) was used to generate a retrospective cohort of patients with first VTE who had received 3 months of anticoagulation. Covariates were collected at baseline and as time-varying data. Hazards with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using a Fine-Gray model. A dynamic model with an additive (logarithmic) scoring scheme was developed from sub-distribution hazard ratios. Discrimination was expressed by the C-statistic. RESULTS: In 51,621 patients with VTE, 3301 CSB events were identified in 206,298 person-years of observation. The 10-year incidence rate for CSB was 1.60 per 100 person-years. The model incorporated 18 independent predictors of CSB, assigning risk scores from 0 to ≥14. Risk of CSB decreased over 10 years but within each year it increased by point category; ranging from 0.60% to 18.1% in the first year (0-≥14 points). Calibration slopes were 0.81 (0.76-0.87) base model, 0.95 (0.88-1.02) extended model; absolute intercepts <0.001 in both. Discrimination was stable, C-statistic 0.78 (0.77-0.79). CONCLUSIONS: Our dynamic score effectively identifies patients at risk of CSB, following 3 months of anticoagulant therapy, with good discrimination. It enables dynamic prediction of bleeding risk over time, accounting for anticoagulation status.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Choudhuri et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Incident venous thromboembolism without active cancer (n=51,621). Dynamic risk score was evaluated on Clinically significant bleeding (CSB) (C-statistic 0.78, 95% CI 0.77-0.79). A dynamic risk score incorporating 18 predictors effectively identified patients at risk of clinically significant bleeding after 3 months of anticoagulation (C-statistic 0.78; 95% CI 0.77-0.79).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: