Key result
Unipolar diathermy safely releases an entrapped LBBAP lead helix after failed mechanical extraction.
Why the study?
Deep septal positioning during LBBAP can be complicated by unexpected lead entrapment in myocardial or fibrotic tissue, making lead advancement or removal challenging when mechanical disengagement fails.
Does unipolar diathermy applied to the terminal pin release an entrapped LBBAP lead helix in patients undergoing pacemaker implantation?
Case Report (n=1)
No
Does unipolar diathermy applied to the terminal pin release an entrapped LBBAP lead helix in patients undergoing pacemaker implantation?
Unipolar diathermy applied to the terminal pin is a feasible bailout strategy for releasing an acutely entrapped LBBAP lead helix when mechanical methods fail.
May offer bailout for entrapped LBBAP helix after mechanical failure; extends single prior case but leaves open need for prospective validation.
Structured Abstract Background Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is increasingly being adopted as a physiological solution to both bradycardia and resynchronisation indications. Deep septal positioning of both stylet-less and stylet driven leads can be complicated by unexpected entrapment in myocardial or fibrotic tissue, making advancement or removal of the lead challenging. Case Summary A patient undergoing LBBAP implantation demonstrated suboptimal electrical parameters after initial lead advancement. Both helical retraction and counter clockwise rotation was unsuccessful in displacing the lead for a second attempt. In line with the only other case study in this situation, 3S of 40W unipolar diathermy was applied to the terminal pin, allowing electrical current to dissipate through the lead tip-tissue interface. This resulted in immediate release of the helix and successful extraction of the lead without mechanical or clinical complications. Discussion Entrapment of the helix during LBBAP is a recognised procedural challenge but inability to overcome this with mechanical disengagement techniques is rare. This occurrence is more likely with extendable helix leads. This case demonstrates a challenging scenario whereby the helix could not be successfully retracted and the lead removed. The novel rescue technique was adapted from a previous case and reinforces the feasibility of this technique.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Clark et al. (2026) conducted a case report in Entrapped left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) lead (n=1). Unipolar diathermy to the terminal pin was evaluated on Release and extraction of the entrapped lead. Application of 3 seconds of 40W unipolar diathermy to the terminal pin resulted in the immediate and safe release of an entrapped LBBAP lead helix after mechanical methods failed.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: