Key result
Exercise mPAP/CO slope >3mmHg/L/min linked to ~310% greater adverse event risk in primary MR.
Why the study?
Exercise-induced pulmonary hypertension defined by the mPAP/CO slope has important diagnostic and prognostic implications, but its value in primary mitral regurgitation with preserved ejection fraction and no or discordant symptoms was unknown.
Does an mPAP/CO slope >3mmHg/L/min predict adverse clinical outcomes better than peak sPAP in patients with at least moderate primary mitral regurgitation and preserved ejection fraction?
Cohort (n=184)
Does an mPAP/CO slope >3mmHg/L/min predict adverse clinical outcomes better than peak sPAP in patients with at least moderate primary mitral regurgitation and preserved ejection fraction?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The mPAP/CO slope during exercise provides superior prognostic value compared to peak sPAP and peak VO2 in patients with primary mitral regurgitation and preserved ejection fraction.
Background Exercise-induced pulmonary hypertension (PH), defined by a mean pulmonary arterial pressure over cardiac output (mPAP/CO) slope >3mmHg/L/min has important diagnostic and prognostic implications. Aims The aim of this study is to investigate the value of the mPAP/CO slope in patients with at least moderate primary MR with preserved ejection fraction and no or discordant symptoms. Methods A total of 184 consecutive patients were evaluated with exercise echocardiography and cardiopulmonary testing. Clinical outcome was defined as the composite of mitral valve intervention, new-onset atrial fibrillation, cardiovascular hospitalization, and all-cause mortality. Results Mean age was 63 years, 59% male, and mean LVEF 67±6%. The mPAP/CO slope correlated with peak VO2 (r = -0.37, p<0.001), while peak sPAP did not (r = -0.05, p=0.517). Thirty-nine percent (n=73) had peak exercise sPAP ≥60 mmHg, and 32% (n=58) had mPAP/CO slope >3mmHg/L/min. Event-free survival was 71% at 1 year and 59% at 2 years, with more clinical events in patients with mPAP/CO slope >3mmHg/L/min (HR of 4.1 (95% CI 2.6–6.5). In 61 patients, mPAP/CO slope and peak sPAP were discordant. Patients with slope >3mmHg/L/mmHg and sPAP <60mmHg (n=23) had worse outcome versus peak sPAP ≥60mmHg and normal slope (n=38, log-rank p=0.037). The mPAP/CO slope improved predictive models for outcome, incremental to resting and exercise sPAP, and peak VO2. Conclusions Exercise PH defined by the mPAP/CO slope >3mmHg/L/min is associated with decreased exercise capacity and higher risk of adverse events in significant primary MR and no or discordant symptoms. The slope provides a greater prognostic value than single sPAP measures and peak VO2.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dhont et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Primary mitral regurgitation with preserved ejection fraction (n=184). mPAP/CO slope >3mmHg/L/min vs. mPAP/CO slope ≤3mmHg/L/min was evaluated on Composite of mitral valve intervention, new-onset atrial fibrillation, cardiovascular hospitalization, and all-cause mortality (HR 4.1, 95% CI 2.6-6.5). An mPAP/CO slope >3mmHg/L/min during exercise was associated with a higher risk of adverse events in patients with primary mitral regurgitation (HR 4.1; 95% CI 2.6-6.5).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: