What question did this study set out to answer?

This review examines how ethical and methodological challenges impact disaster health research and explores the inclusion of person-centred care principles.

June 21, 2026Journal of Global HealthOpen Access

Ethics and methods in disaster health research: a scoping review

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

KGKrzysztof GoniewiczPolish Air Force Academy AKAmir Khorram‐ManeshSahlgrenska University Hospital KNKatarzyna NaylorMedical University of Lublin

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Scoping review examines ethical tensions and methodological constraints in disaster health research, indicating a need for integration of person-centred care principles.

Key Points

This review examines how ethical and methodological challenges impact disaster health research and explores the inclusion of person-centred care principles.
Conducted a structured scoping review of peer-reviewed literature across PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science.
Focused on researching methodology, ethics, and evidence generation in disaster and humanitarian contexts.
Thematically synthesised the extracted data from 28 included studies.
Identified ethical tensions related to participant vulnerability and governance in crisis settings.
Highlighted methodological constraints that limit the generation of robust, context-sensitive evidence.
Recognized inconsistent application of person-centred care principles in disaster research.

Cite This Study

Goniewicz et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a377edf24f042ddf4c59bf3 https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.16.04235

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

Scoping review examines ethical tensions and methodological constraints in disaster health research, indicating a need for integration of person-centred care principles.

Ethics and methods in disaster health research: a scoping review

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

Ethics and methods in disaster health research: a scoping review

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider