Investigates strain effects in MoS2 nanosheets on SCO substrates, indicating complex optoelectronic behavior.
Spin-crossover (SCO) materials often undergo large, reversible lattice changes associated with the spin-state transitions. Coupling such phase-transition solids with two-dimensional (2D) semiconductors provides a promising route toward dynamically tunable strain engineering. Here, we investigate induced strain in MoS 2 nanosheets deposited directly onto SCO single-crystal substrates using variable-temperature Raman and photoluminescence (PL) spectroscopy. Two representative SCO systems with distinct structural motifs are examined: the molecular complex [{Fe(NCSe)(py)} 2 (μ-bpypz) 2 ] ( 1 ), exhibiting a below room temperature spin crossover with ∼4% volume change, and the Hofmann-like framework [Fe(pyrazine){Au(CN) 2 } 2 ] ( 2 ), displaying an above room temperature spin crossover with ∼6% volume change. Despite both substrates undergoing cooperative spin transitions, the MoS 2 layers exhibit fundamentally different optoelectronic responses. In the MoS 2 - 1 heterostructure, the spin transition induces efficient and uniform strain transfer, leading to a reversible Raman shift of the E 2g 1 mode and a hysteretic photoluminescence peak shift that directly reflects bandgap modulation by strain. In contrast, the MoS 2 - 2 heterostructure displays an unconventional response characterized by a pronounced hysteresis in PL intensity with negligible PL peak shift, accompanied by a Raman signature indicative of compressive strain that is opposite to expectations from simple elastic coupling. By comparing these systems with previously reported MoS 2 –SCO heterostructures, we demonstrate that SCO-induced strain in MoS 2 cannot be predicted solely by the magnitude of the substrate volume change. Instead, the crystallographic orientation, surface chemistry, and interfacial conformity collectively determine whether the MoS 2 response is governed by uniform lattice strain, bandgap modulation, or morphology-mediated recombination processes. These findings establish SCO single crystals as versatile mechanical phase change materials capable of programming distinct optoelectronic functionalities in 2D materials through rational interface design.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: