Cross-sectional survey shows simulation-based learning enhances confidence in procedural skills among medical graduates, suggesting further training is beneficial.
Background: Traditional medical education often limits patient-teacher interactions necessary for practicing essential skills. Simulation-based learning (SBL) addresses these challenges by providing a safe environment for clinical practice, minimizing patient risk, and enhancing traditional bedside teaching. Objectives: This study explored how SBL influences the confidence of Almaraffa University medical graduates (2018–2023) in basic procedural skills, emphasizing self-confidence and knowledge retention after graduation. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted between August 2024 and February 2025 among 405 medical graduates at AlMaarefa University (2018–2023) using a validated self-administered questionnaire, after obtaining ethical approval (IRB24-032), to assess feedback on Clinical Professional Skills Course (Skill 402) regarding SBL assessment and its impact on their efficacy during the postgraduate practice. The response rate was 27.65%, and data analysis included median values, interquartile ranges, frequencies, and statistical tests. Results: Most graduates (71.4%) positively viewed SBL, with over 80% fulfilled with the training quality. Highly rated skills included 74.2% for endotracheal and 66% for nasogastric tube insertions, while the speculum procedure received lower ratings, 60.7%. Around 60%–74% indicated a need for more advanced procedure courses and 70.5% suggested course repetition for better skill retention. Conclusions: Most participants positively evaluated SBL for enhancing clinical skills, boosting confidence for residency, and were satisfied with medical procedural training. They suggested additional training for complex procedures and recommended a course repetition for better skill retention. Limitations include low response rates and reliance on self-reported data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elgazzar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: