Randomized trial compares intraoral versus combined intraoral-extraoral photobiomodulation effects on oral mucositis symptoms in chemotherapy patients, indicating significant improvements.
Background: This study was conducted to compare the effects of two clinical protocols-intraoral red laser versus a combination of extraoral infrared laser and intraoral red laser-on the Patient-Reported Oral Mucositis Symptoms (PROMS) scale in patients undergoing chemotherapy. Methods: In this prospective randomized double-blind clinical trial, 45 patients were assigned to three groups, matched by age, sex, chemotherapy type, and baseline oral health status. Group 1 received standard oral care alone, Group 2 received standard oral care plus intraoral photobiomodulation (PBM) using a 635 nm diode laser, and Group 3 received standard oral care combined with both intraoral 635 nm and extraoral 980 nm laser therapy. The PROMS scale was assessed 1 week and 2 weeks after the start of chemotherapy. Results: Significant differences were observed between groups on the PROMS scale at both time points (p = .000). Pairwise comparisons showed improvements in both PBM groups compared to the control group, though no significant difference was found between the two PBM protocols. Conclusion: Photobiomodulation therapy, whether with intraoral laser alone or with intraoral and extraoral lasers, has a significant role in improving the quality of life of gastrointestinal cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khalil et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: