Shows improved inflation forecasting accuracy in U.S. economic contexts, suggesting better decision-making tools for policymakers.
Inflation forecasting plays a critical role in macroeconomic policy and financial decision-making. Accurate forecasts help stabilize economies amid uncertainty. Traditional models often struggle to capture nonlinear dynamics, high-dimensional data, and sudden regime shifts, leading to ineffective policy decisions. This study addresses these gaps by proposing HybridStack, a novel hybrid stacking ensemble combining gradient-boosted trees with regularized linear regression, optimized through Bayesian hyperparameter tuning and meta-learning strategies. The model is trained on a harmonized high-frequency panel dataset constructed by merging ten macro-financial sources covering U.S. inflation from 2006 to 2024. Empirical results show that HybridStack outperforms fifteen baseline models across seven metrics. On the held-out test set, it achieves a root mean squared error (RMSE) of 0.0006, a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.0004, and a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.9999. Notably, HybridStack achieves approximately a 99.92% reduction in RMSE relative to the best-performing prior U.S. study benchmark, a 94.7% reduction compared to the standalone Ridge baseline, and a 97.6% reduction relative to XGBoost on the held-out test set, establishing a new state-of-the-art benchmark within our dataset and evaluation framework. Further explainable AI (XAI) analyses using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME), and Partial Dependence Plots (PDP) highlight the primacy of short-term lags and rolling means as dominant predictors, with inflation expectations exhibiting episodic yet influential effects. This work contributes a transparent, empirically validated forecasting tool for policymakers and researchers, enhancing the reliability and interpretability of inflation predictions in volatile economic environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shiam et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: