Scoping review evaluates excipient safety in pediatric liquid formulations, suggesting improved practices for safety.
Background Extemporaneous liquid antihypertensive formulations are widely used in pediatrics but frequently lack detailed reporting of excipient safety data, particularly regarding age-specific physiological vulnerability and cumulative exposure. Methods A scoping review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA-ScR guidelines to map excipients used in pediatric extemporaneous antihypertensive liquid formulations. A regulatory-oriented assessment was applied, emphasizing age-appropriate safety considerations and exposure-based risk principles, including theoretical daily intake expressed as mg/kg/day. Results Forty-two studies were included. Reporting of excipient concentrations, age targets, and safety justifications was heterogeneous and often incomplete. Vehicles, co-solvents, preservatives, buffers, antioxidants, surfactants, and flavoring agents were identified, with selection typically driven by a focus on physicochemical stability rather than patient-centered criteria, such as age-appropriate excipient safety, dose flexibility, and acceptable volumes. Exposure-based considerations were addressed by a limited number of studies (n = 5). Exposure calculations based on typical pediatric dosing showed that concentrations considered acceptable in adult formulations may translate into clinically relevant toxicity risks in neonates and infants. Based on observed patterns, a conceptual risk stratification framework was developed to categorize excipients according to age-dependent toxicity, cumulative dose burden, and functional tolerability. Conclusions The available literature on compounding antihypertensive formulations mainly emphasizes physicochemical performance, with less attention given to exposure-related safety parameters in pediatric patients. Integrating total daily excipient exposure metrics and structured justification for excipient selection may improve alignment with regulatory expectations and support safer, patient-centered compounding practices in pediatric clinical care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fanhani et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: