Randomized trial evaluates protein-level representations for PPI prediction, suggesting hybrid methods improve outcomes.
Graph neural networks are a natural fit for protein-protein interaction (PPI) prediction because they exploit the graph structure of interactomes, yet it remains unclear how much they benefit from protein-level representations and which sources of protein information matter most. We address this by surveying and organizing the field into a coherent taxonomy that describes three paradigms: network-level approaches (shallow and deep graph representation learning), protein-level approaches (sequence, structure, and function), and hybrid methods that combine both paradigms-providing a cohesive synthesis that highlights their respective strengths, complementarities, and tradeoffs. We developed a unified framework to systematically compare these paradigms that incorporates multiple representative methods and evaluates them on two widely used benchmarks: OGBl-ppa and HuRI. Our results indicate that hybrid methods have improved performance, with function-driven representations emerging as the most informative protein-level representations for PPI prediction. This work provides a taxonomical map of the field, a reproducible framework for evaluating representative methods across paradigms, and practical guidance for future PPI prediction efforts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Balbi et al. (2026) studied this question.