Randomized trial demonstrates real-time acoustic disturbance detection in robotic welding, indicating potential for quality assurance.
Disturbances generated during arc welding processes can be detrimental to the quality of welded structures, and existing automated disturbance-detection methods lack the capability for real-time deployment. This paper proposes an AI-based disturbance-detection framework for gas metal arc welding using microphone-recorded acoustic signals. Representative disturbances – shielding-gas interruption, tip wear, and cutting-oil contamination – were experimentally reproduced and acoustically recorded under three welding conditions. Acoustic features were then extracted from the Mel-spectrograms of the recorded welding sounds and combined with welding parameters (current, voltage, and travel speed) to train a multilayer perceptron classifier capable of identifying both the occurrence and type of disturbance. The trained model achieved an overall accuracy of 81.5% and a macro-F1 score of 82.9%, demonstrating reliable generalization performance. Time-series evaluation indicated that the model could maintain a stable classification performance from the early stage of welding and immediately after the onset of disturbance. Furthermore, a SHAP (Shapley Additive exPlanations) analysis revealed that the decision criteria of the model were physically interpretable: high-frequency attenuation was dominant in shielding-gas interruption, while low-frequency vibration components were characteristic of tip wear. Both the spectral intensity and its variance were identified as key features for accurate disturbance classification. The proposed approach provides a low-cost, noncontact, and real-time monitoring solution that can be easily integrated into robotic welding systems and adapted to various industrial environments, thereby contributing to the realization of autonomous and explainable in-process quality assurance in smart manufacturing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kitano et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: