This article analyses the relationship between entrepreneurial identity and structural inequalities in Cuba, suggesting public policies for equitable social integration.
Este artículo analiza la consolidación de la identidad emprendedora en el sector privado cubano—integrado por trabajadores por cuenta propia (TCP) y micro, pequeñas y medianas empresas (MIPYMES)—en el periodo 2010–2025. Enmarcado en un contexto de policrisis, el estudio emplea la Teoría de la Identidad Social (TIS) y la Teoría de la Autocategorización (TAC) para examinar cómo este grupo construye su identidad y reproduce desigualdades estructurales ligadas a la precariedad, al género y al color de la piel. Metodológicamente, se sustenta en una ruta de investigación mixta con más de 9 000 sujetos. Los hallazgos revelan un tránsito de etiquetas (de “cuentapropista” a “emprendedor/CEO”) y una resiliencia individual que opera como gestión emocional, solapando a menudo la precariedad estructural. Se concluye que el bienestar subjetivo debe ser la brújula de las políticas públicas para transformar al emprendedor en un actor social integrado y equitativo. This article analyses the consolidation of entrepreneurial identity within the Cuban private sector—comprising self-employed workers (TCP) and micro, small, and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs)—between 2010 and 2025. Framed within a polycrisis context, the study employs Social Identity Theory (SIT) and Self-Categorisation Theory (SCT) to examine how this group constructs its identity and reproduces structural inequalities associated with precariousness, gender, and skin colour. Methodologically, it is based on a mixed-methods research path involving over 9,000 subjects, highlighting the 2016 landmark study in Old Havana with the Master Plan. Findings reveal a shift in identification labels (from “self-employed” to “entrepreneur/CEO”) and an individual resilience that operates as emotional management, often masking structural precariousness. The study concludes that subjective well-being must serve as a compass for public policies to transform the entrepreneur into an integrated and equitable social actor.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Daybel Pañellas Álvarez (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: