Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Compares economic and environmental impacts of manufacturing methods for electrical machine stators, implying sustainability benefits for additive processes.
The electrification of industrial systems is increasing demand for manufacturing solutions combining flexibility, efficiency, and sustainability. This study presents a cradle-to-gate economic and environmental comparison of conventional manufacturing (CM) and laser powder bed fusion (PBF-LB/M) for producing electrical machine stators. The CM route involves blanking and assembling M330-35A electrical steel laminations using a high-productivity multi-cavity tooling system. The PBF-LB/M solution considers a monolithic Fe–2.9% Si stator, produced under varying build orientations and platform utilisation scenarios.At high volumes, CM reaches €7.49 per stator and 4.03 kg CO₂-eq. when tooling is fully amortised. PBF-LB/M costs decrease from approximately €1300 to €1000 per part as platform utilisation increases, while CFP ranges from 38 to about 28 kg CO₂-eq. Economic and environmental break-even points occur at approximately 115 and 507 units, respectively, revealing a substantially wider environmental competitiveness window for PBF-LB/M under the present assumptions. Results show competitiveness depends on production volume and configuration, future efficiency, automation, and material-use improvements may shift break-even thresholds.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Colombini et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: