Randomized trial demonstrates improved digit recognition in artificial networks using task-state fMRI data, suggesting enhanced performance due to biologically informed design.
Spiking neural networks (SNNs) are well suited for modeling temporally evolving information due to their event-driven and dynamic neuronal mechanisms. Nevertheless, the majority of existing SNN topologies are constructed through algorithmic procedures rather than guided by constraints from biological brain connectivity, which weakens their biological plausibility. In our earlier work, we developed a spiking neural network (SNN) by incorporating topological information from functional brain networks extracted from functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data of healthy individuals, and named the resulting model fMRISNN. Nevertheless, the fMRI data used in previous work were resting-state fMRI. Compared with resting-state fMRI, task-state fMRI can capture brain-region coordination patterns induced by specific task stimuli, and the resulting functional brain network is therefore more closely related to the corresponding task. Motivated by this advantage, this study replaces the resting-state topology used in previous fMRISNN studies with a task-state, number/digit-related fMRI topology and validates the resulting Task-fMRISNN on handwritten digit recognition. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed Task-fMRISNN outperforms the Rest-fMRISNN in terms of recognition accuracy, lesion robustness, and noise robustness. In addition, the Task-fMRISNN achieves significantly better performance than several baseline models constructed using algorithmically generated topologies. While deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) may deliver superior absolute recognition performance, the proposed fMRISNN provides a more compact model structure and shows potential resource-efficiency advantages due to its sparse and event-driven computational characteristics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: