Develops a scalable laboratory benchmark for water distribution networks, indicating improved validation methods.
Optimisation of water distribution networks (WDNs) for leakage reduction and energy recovery has been extensively investigated through numerical simulations. However, a significant gap remains in the physical validation of these methods because of the lack of scalable laboratory benchmarks. This study addresses this limitation by developing a systematic scaling methodology to translate the Jowitt and Xu benchmark network into a controllable numerical implementation laboratory-scale model, E-NET. The methodology uses a flow-scale factor of 4.33, derived through recursive pipe-diameter adjustment to preserve hydraulic similarity, specifically similarity in head loss and Reynolds number, using commercially available HDPE pipes. To manage leakage, pressure-reducing valves (PRVs) were implemented using a genetic algorithm (GA) to optimise both valve locations and pressure settings under different load conditions. The optimisation followed a pressure-dependent leakage model with a minimum service pressure constraint. Quantitative results showed close agreement between the Jowitt and Xu and the E-NET model, with RMSE values of 0.38 m for head loss. The GA successfully identified broadly consistent optimal PRV locations in both networks, particularly under low-demand conditions. The leakage discrepancies were generally small across the tested valve configurations. This work provides a numerically validated basis for a laboratory benchmark platform and represents a first step towards bridging the gap between theoretical optimisation and physical implementation in WDN pressure management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ferrarese et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: