Study predicts postpartum haemorrhage risk in induced labours, suggesting implications for clinical decision-making.
Background/Objectives: Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) remains a leading cause of maternal morbidity, and the relationship between labour-induction duration and haemorrhagic risk has not been translated into a practical intrapartum risk-stratification framework. We aimed to derive a clinically interpretable induction-duration threshold for PPH risk stratification and to explore an internally validated parsimonious clinical decision-support model. Methods: In this retrospective cohort of 1128 induced singleton labours at ≥37 weeks at a Turkish tertiary centre, laboratory-defined PPH was operationalised as a haemoglobin drop ≥ 2 g/dL. Multivariable logistic regression identified independent predictors; receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis with 2000-replicate bootstrap internal validation derived a duration threshold; calibration, decision curve analysis, and a probability-scaled nomogram were additionally evaluated. Results: PPH occurred in 143 patients (12.7%). Four predictors were independently associated with PPH: induction duration (adjusted odds ratio 1.243 per hour; 95% CI 1.191–1.298; p < 0.001), parity, emergency caesarean, and maternal age. Induction duration achieved an apparent area under the curve of 0.773 (optimism-corrected 0.773); a Youden-optimal threshold of 10.1 h yielded 86.7% (95% CI 80.2–91.3%) sensitivity and 96.8% (95% CI 95.0–97.9%) negative predictive value. The model showed favourable calibration and positive net clinical benefit on decision curve analysis. Conclusions: Induction duration was independently associated with PPH; the internally validated 10.1 h threshold therefore represents a hypothesis-generating risk-stratification benchmark—reflecting an association rather than a demonstrated causal effect—that requires prospective external validation in independent populations before clinical application. Whether this association is causal or reflects an underlying myometrial phenotype requires prospective study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Erbey et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: